Find a Bad Build
You're looking at one.
Where do bad builds come from?
Everywhere. Including our own desks. Bad builds come from tight budgets where QA gets cut first. From deadlines that end at "it looks right on my screen." From all of us not thinking to test with a screen reader until someone points out that we should. We've all been there.
They come from AI tools that generate forty pages of markup in nine seconds—and nobody thinks to audit the output because it looked pretty good. From CMS themes that haven't been updated in years. From page builders that make it easy to build fast and hard to build right.
They come from the reality that accessibility, SEO, and performance aren't taught in most bootcamps, aren't in most job descriptions, and aren't in most project budgets. It's not that people don't care. It's that nobody told them what to check.
They come from good intentions, missing checklists, and the universal belief that "we'll fix it in phase two." Phase two never comes. We know. We've said it too.
The truth is that most websites are bad builds. They just don't know it yet. This one knows. It's self-aware. It's practically winking at you.
Frequently asked questions about bad builds
Is my site a bad build?
Honestly? There's a good chance. Not because you're bad at your job—because this stuff is genuinely hard to catch without a tool. Run a scan. You'll probably find things. Everyone does, including us. The question isn't whether your site has issues. It's how many and whether you know about them.
What if I just built my site?
New sites have issues too. A brand-new build with a modern framework doesn't automatically mean accessibility or SEO compliance—it just means modern JavaScript. The good news is that a fresh codebase is the easiest one to fix. Scan it now before it gets complicated.
Can a bad build be fixed?
Usually, yeah. Most violations are fixable without a redesign or an existential crisis. Add alt text. Fix heading order. Bump up contrast ratios. Label your forms. Compress your images. These aren't rewrites. They're the web development equivalent of doing the dishes—boring, necessary, and somehow never on the sprint board.
What about AI-generated sites?
AI tools can generate markup fast. Like, impressively fast. What they can't do is audit it. The code looks plausible. The semantics are often wrong. The accessibility is a coin flip. And the performance is based on whatever the model was trained on—which is the entire internet, which is mostly sites that were never audited either. Speed is great. Speed without a scan is just shipping faster.
Ready to stop guessing?
The question isn't "is my site a bad build." It probably has issues—most sites do. The real question is "do I know what's broken, and am I checking regularly?"
Quality isn't a finish line. It's a habit. Scan at launch. Scan after the next deploy. Scan when new content goes up. You don't need a perfect score. You need awareness and a plan. We put together a list of tools that make the checking part easy.
